The Inequality Gap and Darwinism

The Economist published a very interesting article in its last issue that discussed the emergence of (human) talent as a critical business issue. Part of this article discussed how a new inequality gap is emerging. Until recently, there has been plenty of discussion about how the rich are privileged and are able to provide the best of opportunities to their progeny, hence boosting them to further riches. And quite the opposite happens to the poor, whose offspring are relegated to a life of poverty. Of course, the exception to this are the shining examples of how an underprivileged youngster is able to work hard or take advantage of a few lucky breaks to pull themeselves out of the lower economic rungs of society. There are quite a few examples of such people who are now famous personalities in their respective fields. I would argue that these people were not only lucky, but more importantly, smart!

This brings me to the core of the Economist article. The point that was being made was that today’s work force rewards intellectual ability more than anything else. The kinds of jobs that require brain power are rising, and it is clear that the winners will be the ’smart’ people. For example, circles of friends are beginning to emerge where everyone is of the same educational qualification or higher. These people marry similar individuals (of similar intellectual capacity and educational qualification). At the risk of generalizing, this means that their children will be of high intellectual capacity. As our workplaces demand and reward people of high intellectual capatity, those people will become the new elite in tomorrow’s society.

So does this mean that tomorrow’s society will be truly Darwinian one? Will Darwin’s ‘fittest’ be society’s smartest? Will it be true that the smartest people will occupy the highest echelons of society? Will meritocracy rule the world? Will society devolve into something that was depicted in the movie, Gattaca, where Eugenics was the norm of the day? Surely the situation portrayed in Gattaca will come to be if we continue to evolve into a meritocratic society! Won’t people want their children to be engineered smart? And does that doom the un-engineered to a life of economic mediocrity?

I have to say – I’m worried for my kids – I’m notoriously bad at standardized tests.

3 Responses to “The Inequality Gap and Darwinism”

  1. botonica Says:

    I see the Darwinian forces at work everyday, kids are taller than their parents, smarter, (i see a lot of eye rolling among them when in conversation with a parent!) and the progeny seems to even look more appealing from generation to generation..

    The example with the poor, you gave is just another Darwinian doctrine..”the survival of the fittest”. No matter how beautiful or smart the rich kids are they are always given a run for their money (no pun intended here) by a driven, less previlaged underdog.

  2. Joseph Says:

    What you say about noting Darwinian forces is true. But I’m wondering if they ‘fittest’ are going to be the ’smartest’, and not necessarily the most physically appealing or strong.

  3. Mama Says:

    Btw, do you even know who Botonica is? Or are you strangely talking to a strange woman who often writes very strangely in Swami’s kinda strange blog entries?


Leave a Reply